August, 2004

Are Your Samples Degenerate?

Several sampling tools and techniques are useful for splitting an entire lot of loose, solid material, such as grains, pellets, and soil, into two or more fractions. Each fraction separated from the lot is a potential sample, and the actual sample is "selected" from among these. Splitting is a form of subsampling that can be done in sequence using the same or different methods to obtain smaller and smaller quantities for the amount required for chemical and/or physical analyses. The riffle splitter, discussed in our last E-Newsletter (What's Wrong With This Picture?), is a good example.

The most important principle to follow with a splitting technique is to select the fraction that is to be the sample (1) after the lot has been split and (2) at random. If these two conditions are not satisfied, then the splitting is said to be degenerate (Chapter 22 from Gy, reference below). Knowing in advance which fraction is to be the sample provides opportunities for unconscious bias or even fraud. This happens, for example, when one of the receiving bins from a riffler is not chosen at random after the lot has been split in two.

            In previous newsletters, we have given Gy's Principle of Correct Sampling. All constituent elements of the lot have an equal opportunity of being in the sample, and the sample integrity is preserved both during and after sampling. Correct Selection in a splitting process is defined in a similar way. All fractions separated from the lot are potential samples that have equal probabilities of being selected as the actual samples. This means that an equiprobable random selection process must be used after the split. We give three examples of correct and incorrect selection.

Example 1: The material is moving, and the sampling device is stationary. The riffle splitter discussed earlier is a case in point. Two potential samples, one in each receiving bin, are produced after passing the material through the riffler. One of the two potential samples is chosen at random, such as by tossing a fair coin, and becomes the actual sample. Degenerate sampling occurs in this case when the bin is selected in advance. Gy reports a bias of over 10% on the mass and over 2% on the lead content of a galena ore in a case where two sampling errors occurred. The riffler was used incorrectly, and the same bin was selected for the next stage of riffling in a sequence of four splits.

Example 2: The material is stationary, and the sampling tool is moving. With alternative shoveling, shown below, alternate scoops or shovels of material are put into two piles. Each pile is a potential sample, and a coin toss can be used to select the actual sample. Degenerate sampling occurs when one of the piles is selected in advance. For example, when the lot contains coarse fragments with a diameter larger than about 1/3 of the shovel width and which contain more of the constituent of interest, the operator can influence the result. If s/he is able to preselect the pile that will be the actual sample, then s/he can selectively help some of the coarsest fragments fall from the shovel when desired.

Example 3: Both the material and the sampling tool are moving. A sectorial divider feeds a lot of material into a set of receiving bins. Either the feeder rotates over the bins, or the bins rotate under the feeder. As in the previous examples, the material in each bin is a potential sample. The actual sample selection must be done at random and after the splitting is complete. Unfortunately, some dividers are used not to split the entire lot but rather to feed material only until a specified mass is obtained. This technique violates Gy's Principle of Correct Sampling because part of the lot has no chance of being in the sample.

Moral: To avoid degenerate splitting, select the fraction that is to be the actual sample (1) after splitting the entire lot and (2) at random.

More information about sampling equipment and procedures for solids, liquids, and gases is available in the short introductory book A Primer for Sampling Solids, Liquids, and Gases, by Dr. Patricia L. Smith.

** Gy, Pierre M. (1992). Sampling of heterogeneous and dynamic material systems: theories of heterogeneity, sampling and homogenizing, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 653 pages.


Patricia L. Smith, Ph.D., Owner
Phone: 806.798.3420
Fax: 281.749.8158
E-mail: alpha@alphastat.com
Web: www.alphastat.com

"Your decisions are only as good as your samples."

Sign up here to receive a quarterly one page 
E-Newsletter from Alpha Stat Consulting. 
You can unsubscribe or resubscribe at any time.
Email:

 

Newsletters | About the Owner | Bulk Sampling Short Course
Bulk Sampling
| Six Sigma | SPC, QC, QA |
Data Analysis
Implementation of Systems and Processes | Consulting  & Training | Home


E-mail: 
alpha@alphastat.com

© 2001 All Rights Reserved